How to Build a CHES Study Plan That Actually Works

Passing the CHES exam is not about studying more. It is about studying with intention. Candidates who approach their preparation with a structured plan consistently outperform those who open a textbook and hope for the best. The exam covers eight distinct Areas of Responsibility, each weighted differently, and the questions demand applied reasoning rather than rote recall. Without a plan that accounts for this complexity, even diligent studying can leave critical gaps.

This guide provides a practical framework for building a study plan that fits your life, targets the areas that matter most, and keeps you accountable from day one through exam day. If you are unfamiliar with the content framework the exam is built on, start with our overview of the Eight Areas of Responsibility before mapping out your schedule.

Assess Your Starting Point

Before you can build an effective plan, you need an honest picture of where you stand. Not every candidate enters exam preparation with the same strengths. A recent graduate from a CEPH-accredited program may feel confident in needs assessment but weak on advocacy competencies. A working professional may have deep implementation experience but limited exposure to research and evaluation methods.

Start by reviewing the competencies and sub-competencies within each of the eight areas. For each one, rate your comfort level on a simple scale: confident, somewhat familiar, or unfamiliar. This self-assessment does not need to be scientifically rigorous. Its purpose is to surface the areas that will demand the most attention so you can allocate your limited study time accordingly.

If you have access to a practice exam or diagnostic quiz, take it before you begin studying. Your initial score matters less than the pattern of your mistakes. Did you miss questions concentrated in a particular area? Did scenario-based items trip you up more than knowledge recall? These patterns will shape your plan.

Prioritize by Exam Weight

The CHES exam does not distribute its 150 scored questions evenly across the eight areas. Some areas carry significantly more weight than others, and your study plan should reflect that imbalance.

Area I (Assessment of Needs and Capacity) and Area II (Planning) together account for a substantial portion of the exam. Area III (Implementation) and Area IV (Evaluation and Research) are also heavily represented. The remaining four areas, while important, carry comparatively less weight individually.

This does not mean you can ignore lower-weight areas. A question on ethics or advocacy counts just as much toward your passing score as a question on needs assessment. But it does mean that if you have limited time, spending three hours on Area I will likely yield a greater return than spending three hours on an area that contributes fewer questions to the exam.

Pro Tip: When building your schedule, assign study time proportionally to exam weight, then add extra time for any area you flagged as unfamiliar in your self-assessment. This two-factor approach ensures you cover the high-value content and your personal weak spots.

A Sample 8-Week Study Schedule

Eight weeks is a realistic timeline for most candidates who are studying part-time alongside work or school. Adjust the pacing based on your self-assessment and available hours, but resist the urge to compress the schedule into fewer weeks. Spreading your study sessions across time enables spaced repetition, which research consistently shows improves long-term retention.

Weeks 1-2: Assessment and Planning (Areas I and II)

Dedicate your first two weeks to the two areas that carry the most exam weight. Focus on understanding needs assessment methodologies, data collection techniques, stakeholder engagement, and the fundamentals of program planning. These areas form the foundation for much of the applied reasoning the exam requires. Work through practice questions at the end of each study session to test your comprehension in context.

Weeks 3-4: Implementation and Evaluation (Areas III and IV)

Move into implementation strategies and evaluation methods. Area III covers how health education programs are delivered, including training, communication, and resource management. Area IV addresses research design, data analysis, and how evaluation findings inform program improvement. Pay close attention to the logic that connects planning to implementation to evaluation, as the exam frequently tests this chain of reasoning.

Weeks 5-6: Areas V Through VIII

These four areas cover administration and management, advocacy, communication and informatics, and ethics. While each carries less individual weight on the exam, collectively they represent a meaningful share of the scored questions. Spend roughly equal time on each area during these two weeks. If your self-assessment identified any of these as a particular weakness, shift additional time toward it.

Week 7: Practice Questions and Scenario-Based Review

Step away from content review and focus entirely on practice. Work through full-length practice sets and pay special attention to scenario-based questions, which require you to apply competencies to realistic situations. After each practice session, review every question you missed and identify whether the gap was in content knowledge or in test-taking strategy.

Week 8: Final Review and Weak-Area Reinforcement

Use your final week to revisit the areas where practice questions revealed persistent weaknesses. Do not attempt to learn new material at this stage. Instead, reinforce what you have already studied and build confidence. Light review sessions of 30 to 45 minutes are more productive during this phase than marathon study days. Avoid the common mistakes that derail candidates in the final stretch.

Daily Study Habits That Stick

A weekly schedule only works if your daily habits support it. The following techniques are backed by learning science and are particularly effective for competency-based exams like CHES.

Active recall. After reading a section, close the material and write down or verbally explain the key concepts from memory. This forces your brain to retrieve information rather than passively recognize it, which strengthens retention significantly.

Spaced repetition. Review previously studied material at increasing intervals. If you studied Area I on Monday, revisit it briefly on Wednesday, then again the following Monday. Spaced repetition combats the natural forgetting curve and keeps earlier material fresh as you progress through new areas.

Practice questions after every session. Do not wait until Week 7 to start answering questions. Even five or ten practice items at the end of each study session connect abstract content to the applied format of the exam. This habit also reduces the anxiety many candidates feel when encountering scenario-based questions for the first time.

Time-boxed sessions. Study in focused blocks of 45 to 60 minutes with short breaks in between. Research on concentration suggests that most people cannot sustain high-quality focus beyond this window. Two focused hours are more productive than four distracted ones.

Pro Tip: Keep a running log of questions you get wrong and the areas they fall under. By Week 7, this log becomes a personalized study guide that targets exactly the content you need to reinforce.

Staying Accountable

The best study plan in the world fails without accountability. Here are practical ways to stay on track.

Tell someone your timeline. Sharing your exam date and study schedule with a friend, colleague, or mentor creates social accountability. Knowing that someone will ask about your progress makes it harder to skip sessions.

Schedule study time like a meeting. Block specific hours on your calendar and treat them as non-negotiable. Candidates who study "whenever they have time" rarely find enough of it.

Track your progress visually. Use a simple checklist, spreadsheet, or wall calendar to mark completed study sessions. Visual evidence of your consistency builds momentum, and gaps in the record provide an honest signal when you are falling behind.

Find a study partner or group. Explaining concepts to another person is one of the most effective learning strategies available. Even if your study partner is preparing for a different exam, the act of teaching forces you to organize your thinking and identify gaps in your own understanding.

A structured plan transforms exam preparation from an overwhelming task into a series of manageable steps. Build the plan, follow the plan, and adjust when the data from your practice sessions tells you to. The CHES exam is challenging, but it is entirely conquerable with deliberate, well-organized effort.

This content is not affiliated with or endorsed by NCHEC. CHES and MCHES are registered trademarks of NCHEC.