Academic CV Builder
Build and manage your academic curriculum vitae.
Share This Tool
This tool is 100% free and requires no login
Loading tool...
This may take a few seconds
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between an academic CV and a resume?
Academic CVs are comprehensive documents listing your entire academic and research career with no length limit - commonly 2-20+ pages depending on career stage. Include all publications, presentations, grants, teaching, service, and research experience. Resumes are brief (1-2 pages) summaries tailored for specific non-academic jobs, highlighting relevant skills and accomplishments. CVs grow throughout your career; resumes are customized for each application. For academic positions, tenure review, and grant applications, use a CV. For industry, government, or non-profit positions outside academia, adapt your CV into a targeted resume.
How should I organize my academic CV sections?
Standard CV sections (in typical order): (1) Contact information and professional profiles, (2) Education (degrees, institutions, dates), (3) Research/Academic Positions, (4) Publications (often subdivided: books, peer-reviewed articles, chapters, conference papers), (5) Presentations (invited talks, conference presentations), (6) Grants and Funding, (7) Teaching Experience, (8) Service (editorial boards, reviewing, committees), (9) Awards and Honors, (10) Professional Memberships, (11) Skills and Certifications. Order may vary by discipline and career stage. Tailor prominence of sections to application - emphasize teaching for teaching-focused positions, research for R1 universities.
Should I include manuscripts under review on my CV?
Yes, but clearly label their status. Create a publications section with subsections: (1) Published/In Press - full citation, (2) Under Review - omit journal name to avoid bias, state "manuscript under review," (3) In Preparation - only include if submission is imminent. Never list rejected manuscripts or manuscripts you abandoned. Update your CV promptly when manuscripts are accepted. For job applications, under review manuscripts demonstrate active research productivity beyond published work. However, search committees weight published work much more heavily - focus energy on getting papers published rather than accumulating "under review" entries.