Free 16-Week Course
The Grant ArchitectStrategic proposal engineering, federal grants, and AI integration.
A self-paced grant-writing course covering 16 weeks of material: the grant-seeking landscape, prospect research, need statements, logic models, SMART objectives, capacity and partnerships, evaluation, budgeting, narrative strategy, federal grant specifics, submission and resubmission, post-award management, career development, AI in grant strategy, and international funding. Video lessons publish on a rolling schedule; supporting notes follow each release.
Grant Track
The Grant
Architect
by Angel Reyes
Course outline
176 lessons across 16 modules · ~88 hours total · click any lesson to start
Module 1: The Landscape of Grant Seeking and Ethics
- Lesson 1
The Grant Ecosystem
- Distinguish grants from contracts and gifts using federal definitions.
- Identify the three primary funder sectors and their core differences.
- Explain why treating all funders the same wastes time and credibility.
- Lesson 2
The Grant Lifecycle
- Name and sequence the three phases of the grant lifecycle.
- Describe the deliverables and risks specific to each phase.
- Identify which mistakes most commonly disqualify organizations from future funding.
- Lesson 3
Government Funders (Federal)
- Describe the compliance-driven culture of federal funders.
- Distinguish between grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts under federal definitions.
- Identify the major federal funding agencies and their statutory missions.
- Lesson 4
State and Local Funding
- Define block grants and formula grants and explain how they reach nonprofits.
- Describe the role of a pass-through entity in federal subrecipient relationships.
- Identify state and local funding sources that have no federal origin.
- Lesson 5
Private Foundations
- Distinguish the major foundation categories (independent, family, community, operating, corporate).
- Explain why foundation funding is "fit-driven" more than "need-driven."
- Locate and read an IRS Form 990-PF for any private foundation.
- Lesson 6
Corporate Philanthropy & CSR
- Identify the three primary corporate giving vehicles (direct giving, corporate foundation, cause marketing).
- Explain how CSR strategy shapes funding priorities.
- Quantify the value of recognition assets you can offer a corporate funder.
- Lesson 7
Organizational Readiness - Legal
- Describe the requirements for active 501(c)(3) public charity status.
- Distinguish between a public charity and a private foundation under section 509.
- Verify any organization's tax-exempt standing on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search.
- Lesson 8
System Registration - SAM & UEI
- Explain why SAM.gov registration and a UEI are prerequisites for federal funding.
- List the documents and information required to complete registration.
- Build a renewal calendar that prevents lapses.
- Lesson 9
Operational Capacity Audit
- Name the five domains of operational capacity funders evaluate.
- Apply a structured self-assessment to your own or a client's organization.
- Decide which gaps to fix before applying versus address in the narrative.
- Lesson 10
Ethics in Grant Writing
- Recite the rule on commission-based compensation and explain why it exists.
- Identify common conflicts of interest in client and employer engagements.
- Apply the GPA Code of Ethics to realistic gray-area scenarios.
- Lesson 11
AI Spotlight
- Distinguish generative AI tools from analytical AI tools in grant work.
- Identify the failure modes that disqualify AI-assisted submissions.
- Apply the Human-in-the-Loop principle to a realistic drafting workflow.
Module 2: Strategic Research and Prospecting
- Lesson 12
Introduction to Prospect Research
- Explain why prospect research is the highest-leverage activity in the grant cycle.
- Quantify the cost of the "spray and pray" approach in hours and dollars.
- Name the four signals that distinguish a real prospect from a pipe dream.
- Lesson 13
Database Mastery - Grants.gov
- Configure Grants.gov saved searches and email alerts for your program areas.
- Triage a NOFO summary page in under five minutes.
- Distinguish forecasted, posted, and closed opportunities and use each correctly.
- Lesson 14
Database Mastery - Foundation Directory
- Search Foundation Directory Online (or a free alternative) by subject, geography, and gift size.
- Read a foundation profile for the three signals that predict a real fit.
- Cross-reference FDO data with the foundation's actual 990 filings.
- Lesson 15
Keyword Triangulation
- Generate three to five synonym clusters for any program area in fifteen minutes.
- Run a keyword matrix across at least two databases.
- Capture and reuse the language that funders themselves use in published priorities.
- Lesson 16
Decoding IRS Form 990 - Part 1
- Locate a foundation's 990-PF on ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer in under three minutes.
- Read Part I to gauge capacity, revenue, expenses, and net assets.
- Identify decision-makers from the officers and directors list.
- Lesson 17
Decoding IRS Form 990 - Part 2
- Analyze a Part XV grants paid schedule to find median gift size and recipient pattern.
- Map a foundation's recent giving by geography and recipient type.
- Identify anchor grantees and infer discretionary capacity.
- Lesson 18
Dissecting the NOFO / RFP
- Shred a NOFO in three structured passes (eligibility, structure, hidden requirements).
- Build a compliance matrix that becomes your proposal outline.
- Identify embedded requirements not listed in the application checklist.
- Lesson 19
Eligibility Checklists
- Build a standardized eligibility checklist that runs in fifteen minutes.
- Identify threshold requirements (org type, geography, match, registrations, audit).
- Produce a written go/no-go memo with a one-line rationale.
- Lesson 20
The Pre-Proposal Contact
- Decide when pre-proposal contact is appropriate based on the NOFO or guidelines.
- Prepare a fifteen-minute call with three to five high-value questions.
- Conduct the call with professional etiquette and intelligence-gathering discipline.
- Lesson 21
Pipeline Management
- Build a twelve-month grant pipeline in a spreadsheet or CRM.
- Track prospects through stages (researched, qualified, drafting, submitted, awarded, declined).
- Forecast probability-adjusted revenue and balance new submissions against renewal reports.
- Lesson 22
AI Spotlight
- Use AI to summarize a 990-PF, extract foundation priorities, and draft a funder profile.
- Generate keyword synonym clusters and a first-cut NOFO compliance matrix with AI assistance.
- Identify the three to four common hallucinations that long AI outputs produce in research work.
Module 3: Defining the Problem and the Need
- Lesson 23
Problem Vs. Need
- Distinguish a beneficiary problem from an organizational need in any draft statement.
- Rewrite "we need" sentences into beneficiary-centered problem framings.
- Identify the subject of a need statement and judge whether it serves the funder or the applicant.
- Lesson 24
Root Cause Analysis
- Apply the 5 Whys technique to any presenting problem in your community.
- Document a causal chain that connects symptoms to systemic conditions.
- Decide when to stop drilling so the chain stays within a fundable scope.
- Lesson 25
Data Hierarchy - National
- Identify the primary federal data sources used in grant need statements.
- Pull a single defensible national figure with date and methodology recorded.
- Integrate national data into a need paragraph without padding.
- Lesson 26
Data Hierarchy - Local
- Source local data at the county, ZIP code, or census tract level.
- Read local figures against state and national benchmarks for context.
- Build a short local data appendix to support any need statement.
- Lesson 27
Conducting a Gap Analysis
- Map the current service providers in your target community.
- Identify the specific population, geography, or service type that is underserved.
- Produce a one-page gap table for any proposal.
- Lesson 28
Literature Review Fundamentals
- Conduct a scan-based literature review appropriate to grant timelines.
- Identify seminal and recent sources for any intervention model.
- Use clearinghouses and indexes such as Google Scholar, PubMed, and What Works Clearinghouse.
- Lesson 29
Citation Strategy
- Pair seminal and recent sources within a single supporting paragraph.
- Match citation depth to the claim being made.
- Maintain consistent citation formatting across the proposal.
- Lesson 30
Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR)
- Describe the core principles of Community-Based Participatory Research.
- Plan a realistic engagement process within a typical proposal timeline.
- Document community input in ways reviewers recognize as authentic.
- Lesson 31
Qualitative Validation
- Gather, transcribe, and de-identify usable quotes from focus groups or interviews.
- Pair statistics with human voices to create combined evidence.
- Apply ethical attribution practices including consent and pseudonyms.
- Lesson 32
The "Hook" Statement
- Draft three candidate hooks for any proposal you write.
- Apply the "would a tired reviewer keep reading" test.
- Avoid overpromising drama that triggers reviewer skepticism.
- Lesson 33
AI Spotlight
- Use AI to summarize lengthy community assessments into the findings that matter.
- Generate first-pass outlines that you will then rewrite in your own voice.
- Verify every AI-generated statistic against a primary source.
Module 4: The Logic Model and Theory of Change
- Lesson 34
Introduction to Logic Models
- Define the six standard components of a logic model and the order they appear in.
- Explain why reverse-engineering from impact back to inputs produces stronger design than starting with activities.
- Recognize the "activity trap" and the warning signs of a weak causal chain.
- Lesson 35
Inputs - The Resources
- Inventory the full set of inputs a program requires, including in-kind and existing contributions.
- Distinguish grant-funded inputs from inputs already in place.
- Map each input to the activity it enables in the next column.
- Lesson 36
Activities - The Intervention
- Write activities that specify population, dosage, and delivery method.
- Map each activity to the inputs that enable it and the outputs it produces.
- Avoid activity overload by matching the number of activities to the available resources.
- Lesson 37
Outputs - The Widgets
- Write outputs as countable, direct products of specific activities.
- Distinguish outputs from outcomes and explain the difference to a non-evaluator.
- Set output targets that are ambitious yet defensible given the inputs and activities.
- Lesson 38
Outcomes - Short Term
- Write short-term outcomes that capture changes in knowledge, attitudes, skills, or self-efficacy.
- Pair each short-term outcome with a candidate measurement approach.
- Distinguish short-term outcomes from outputs and from intermediate behavior changes.
- Lesson 39
Outcomes - Intermediate and Long-Term
- Write intermediate outcomes that capture behavior change in participants.
- Write long-term outcomes that capture condition change in participants or communities.
- Avoid the outcome leap by adding the missing behavior step between awareness and condition change.
- Lesson 40
Theory of Change (ToC)
- Draft a Theory of Change statement using the if-then-because template.
- Identify and write the "because" clause that names the underlying mechanism.
- Connect the Theory of Change to at least one citation or established framework.
- Lesson 41
Assumptions and External Factors
- Distinguish assumptions (conditions inside the program logic) from external factors (forces outside the program's control).
- Surface assumptions at every layer of the logic model.
- Pair the highest-risk assumptions and external factors with realistic mitigation plans.
- Lesson 42
Visual Design Tools
- Produce a publication-quality logic model graphic using free or low-cost tools.
- Apply the standard left-to-right column layout with clear causal arrows.
- Make small design choices (font, contrast, box shapes) that survive a black-and-white photocopier.
- Lesson 43
Narrative Alignment
- Use the logic model as a table of contents for the project narrative.
- Run an alignment audit in both directions (diagram to text, and text to diagram).
- Discipline the narrative structure using the logic model columns.
- Lesson 44
AI Spotlight
- Use AI to expand a thin activities list with evidence-based interventions targeted to specific outcomes.
- Use AI to stress-test a draft logic model for outcome leaps, vague language, and missing assumptions.
- Use AI to draft an initial Theory of Change paragraph that a human then refines with citations and mechanism language.
Module 5: Goals, Objectives, and Specific Aims
- Lesson 45
Goals Vs. Objectives
- Distinguish a goal from an objective using the aspiration-versus-measurement test.
- Classify any program statement at the correct level of the hierarchy.
- Nest two to four objectives under each goal in a way reviewers can follow.
- Lesson 46
The S.M.A.R.T Framework
- Define each of the five SMART criteria in plain language.
- Audit any draft objective against the five criteria in under a minute.
- Rewrite weak objectives to pass all five tests without losing program intent.
- Lesson 47
Writing Workshop - Objectives
- Apply a repeatable transformation pattern to weak objectives.
- Add population, metric, instrument, and deadline in the correct order.
- Split bloated objectives that promise too many outcomes at once.
- Lesson 48
The NIH Specific Aims Page
- Reproduce the canonical three-part structure of the Specific Aims page.
- Draft each paragraph for its intended reviewer reaction.
- Diagnose why an existing Specific Aims page is underperforming.
- Lesson 49
The Research Hypothesis
- Write a central hypothesis as a falsifiable, declarative prediction.
- Derive aim-level sub-hypotheses that each aim is designed to test.
- Stress-test each hypothesis for direction, mechanism, and falsifiability.
- Lesson 50
Process Objectives
- Distinguish process objectives from outcome objectives.
- Write process objectives that are auditable and achievable.
- Align process objectives with budget, staffing, and activity plans.
- Lesson 51
Outcome Objectives
- Write outcome objectives with population, construct, magnitude, instrument, and timeline.
- Defend target magnitudes with baseline data or published benchmarks.
- Phase outcomes across short-term, intermediate, and long-term timeframes.
- Lesson 52
Milestones and Timelines
- Break each objective into quarterly or semi-annual milestones.
- Build a milestone table with target dates and responsible parties.
- Identify critical-path milestones whose slippage threatens the project.
- Lesson 53
Mission Match
- Harvest priority language from the funder's strategic plan and announcement.
- Weave that language into objectives without distorting the program.
- Build a crosswalk between your objectives and the funder's stated priorities.
- Lesson 54
The "Fatal Flaw" Review
- Identify the five most common fatal flaws in an objectives section.
- Run a structured fatal-flaw review on your own drafts in under 30 minutes.
- Document findings in writing and decide whether to fix, descope, or withdraw.
- Lesson 55
AI Spotlight
- Run a four-step workflow that uses AI to draft SMART objectives.
- Prime a language model with funder priority language before drafting.
- Validate AI-suggested targets against baseline data and budget reality.
Module 6: Organizational Capacity and Partnerships
- Lesson 56
The "Organization" Narrative
- Write an organization narrative that could only describe your entity, not a generic peer.
- Layer founding story, operational track record, and current positioning into a single capacity section.
- Replace boilerplate language with dates, dollar figures, and named programs.
- Lesson 57
Governance and Leadership
- Describe the elements of a governance paragraph that funders expect to see.
- Distinguish between governing boards and working boards in your written description.
- Name the core fiscal oversight policies a strong proposal references.
- Lesson 58
Staffing and Models
- Calculate Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) for each position in a staffing plan.
- Build a staffing table that names roles, FTEs, supervisors, and deliverables.
- Distinguish between employees and consultants and justify each choice.
- Lesson 59
Biosketches - NIH / NSF Format
- Name the four standard sections of an NIH biosketch and the parallel NSF sections.
- Draft a personal statement that ties an investigator's prior work to the proposed project.
- Select the five contributions or products that carry the most weight for a given proposal.
- Lesson 60
Biosketches - Narrative Format
- Convert a federal-style CV into a narrative biosketch suitable for a foundation proposal.
- Decide when to include lived experience and community ties.
- Edit a draft bio that another team member has written.
- Lesson 61
The Management Plan
- Build a Gantt chart that maps deliverables across the full project period.
- Construct a responsibility matrix using the RACI framework.
- Describe contingency plans for the most common project risks.
- Lesson 62
Partnership Taxonomy
- Name the five operational categories of external organizations on a grant.
- Assign each external organization to the correct category and defend the choice.
- Identify the documentation each category requires.
- Lesson 63
Memoranda of Understanding (MOU)
- Name the standard sections of an enforceable MOU.
- Quantify partner contributions in a contributions clause.
- Handle data sharing and confidentiality terms when client information will be exchanged.
- Lesson 64
Letters of Support (LOS)
- Name the elements of a high-impact letter of support.
- Write a model letter that a busy executive can sign in five minutes.
- Track ten or more letters across partners and deadlines.
- Lesson 65
Sustainability Models
- Name the four most common sustainability strategies and the conditions under which each is credible.
- Replace "we will seek more grants" with documented, specific pathways.
- Support sustainability claims with evidence such as MOUs, fee schedules, or board resolutions.
- Lesson 66
AI Spotlight
- Use prompt patterns to draft capacity narratives, biosketches, and sustainability statements.
- Generate three funder-tailored versions of a single master mission statement.
- Apply a verification discipline that catches fabricated credentials before submission.
Module 7: Evaluation Methodologies
- Lesson 67
Evaluation Fundamentals
- Explain why funders increasingly require rigorous evaluation rather than anecdotal reporting.
- Distinguish evaluation for accountability from evaluation for learning.
- Name the elements every credible evaluation plan must contain.
- Lesson 68
Formative Evaluation
- Define formative evaluation and its role during program delivery.
- Draft formative evaluation questions tied to real implementation decisions.
- Identify short-cycle data sources that staff will actually maintain.
- Lesson 69
Summative Evaluation
- Define summative evaluation and its role at the end of a phase or grant.
- Translate vague objectives into measurable summative indicators.
- Identify the baseline, target, and measurement window for each outcome.
- Lesson 70
Quantitative Methods
- Identify the three workhorse quantitative tools used in grant evaluation.
- Explain why validated instruments produce more credible findings than custom surveys.
- Distinguish process indicators from outcome indicators.
- Lesson 71
Qualitative Methods
- Identify the core qualitative methods used in grant evaluation.
- Choose between focus groups and individual interviews based on topic sensitivity.
- Draft open-ended questions that do not lead the respondent.
- Lesson 72
Mixed Methods Design
- Name the three core mixed methods designs and when each fits.
- Define triangulation and explain how it strengthens findings.
- Integrate quantitative and qualitative strands at the analysis stage.
- Lesson 73
The Evaluation Matrix
- Construct an evaluation matrix that aligns objectives, indicators, sources, methods, and timeline.
- Use the matrix to expose weak objectives and missing data sources.
- Distinguish rows that need external evaluator capacity from those that fit internal staff.
- Lesson 74
Internal Vs. External Evaluators
- Compare internal, external, and hybrid evaluator models.
- Recognize when funders effectively require an external evaluator.
- Draft scope of work language for the chosen model.
- Lesson 75
Budgeting for Evaluation
- Apply the 5 to 10 percent working rule of thumb for evaluation budgets.
- Build an evaluation budget from the bottom up across all required line items.
- Identify the line items most commonly forgotten.
- Lesson 76
Dissemination Planning
- Identify the core dissemination channels and the audiences each one serves.
- Plan dissemination during the proposal stage, not after the evaluation ends.
- Translate one evaluation into multiple audience-tuned products.
- Lesson 77
AI Spotlight
- Use AI to accelerate drafting of evaluation matrices, survey items, and dissemination plans.
- Identify the elements of an evaluation plan that still require human validation.
- Recognize common AI failure modes in evaluation work.
Module 8: Budgeting Fundamentals
- Lesson 78
Introduction to Federal Cost Principles
- Locate 2 CFR Part 200 and identify the subparts that govern federal cost decisions.
- Name the three tests (allowable, allocable, reasonable) every federal cost must pass.
- Explain why agency budget templates are not the source of truth for federal cost rules.
- Lesson 79
The "Prudent Person" Test
- Define the prudent person standard as written in 2 CFR 200.
- Apply the standard to a real cost decision before submission.
- Document the rationale for a cost at the time of the decision.
- Lesson 80
Allocable and Allowable
- Distinguish allowability (regulation) from allocability (proportional benefit).
- Identify costs that are unallowable on their face under 2 CFR 200.
- Apply an allocation methodology to a shared cost.
- Lesson 81
Direct Costs Defined
- Define direct costs under 2 CFR 200 with the specificity test.
- Classify a draft cost list into direct and indirect columns.
- Recognize the narrow exception for administrative and clerical salaries as direct costs.
- Lesson 82
Indirect Costs (F & A) Overview
- Define Facilities and Administrative (F&A) costs and the categories they cover.
- Explain why federal regulations created indirect cost rates.
- Distinguish a Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (NICRA) from the de minimis rate.
- Lesson 83
Calculating F & A Rates
- Identify the rate (NICRA or de minimis) applicable to a given proposal.
- Build the Modified Total Direct Costs (MTDC) base correctly.
- Apply the exclusions to MTDC before calculating indirect recovery.
- Lesson 84
Personnel Costs
- Distinguish institutional base salary from charged salary.
- Convert level of effort into a defensible salary calculation.
- Apply the correct treatment of academic-year versus summer salary.
- Lesson 85
Fringe Benefits
- Identify the components of a fringe rate.
- Apply the organization's approved fringe rate by employee class.
- Justify the fringe rate in the budget narrative.
- Lesson 86
Travel Policies
- Apply GSA per diem and federal mileage rates to project travel.
- Distinguish staff, consultant, and participant support travel.
- Justify each trip with a purpose tied to the project scope.
- Lesson 87
Equipment Vs. Supplies
- Apply the federal definition of equipment (per-unit cost and useful life).
- Classify tangible purchases as equipment or supplies.
- Explain the procurement and property management implications of the classification.
- Lesson 88
AI Spotlight
- Identify budget tasks where AI compresses real effort.
- Identify budget inputs where AI is unsafe (rates, thresholds, current regulation).
- Design a Human-in-the-Loop workflow for budget drafting.
Module 9: Advanced Budgeting and Strategy
- Lesson 89
Cost Sharing (Match) Overview
- Distinguish mandatory, voluntary committed, and voluntary uncommitted match.
- Explain why over-matching exposes an organization to disallowed costs.
- Identify the documentation an auditor will demand for each match category.
- Lesson 90
Valuation of In-Kind Contributions
- Apply the federal valuation standards in 2 CFR 200.306 to common in-kind categories.
- Value donated time, space, equipment, and services defensibly.
- Document each in-kind contribution to survive audit review.
- Lesson 91
Multi-Year Forecasting
- Build budgets that escalate realistically across a multi-year period of performance.
- Distinguish recurring escalation from program-driven scaling.
- Sequence one-time costs into the years they actually occur.
- Lesson 92
Inflation and COLA
- Distinguish a cost-of-living adjustment from a merit increase.
- Anchor each escalation assumption to a citable benchmark or policy.
- Build an escalation table that a reviewer can audit line by line.
- Lesson 93
Subawards Vs. Contractors
- Apply the 2 CFR 200.331 five-factor test to a partner relationship.
- Distinguish programmatic risk from performance risk.
- Explain why misclassification triggers audit findings.
- Lesson 94
Subrecipient Monitoring
- Build the four-part subrecipient monitoring stack required under 2 CFR 200.332.
- Conduct a pre-award risk assessment that scores partners on capacity and history.
- Flow down federal terms in the subaward agreement.
- Lesson 95
Program Income
- Define program income under 2 CFR 200.307.
- Distinguish the additive, deductive, and matching methods of treatment.
- Set up tracking so program income is captured against the project.
- Lesson 96
Writing The Budget Justification
- Apply the five-element framework to every budget line.
- Convert thin justifications into defensible ones without padding.
- Anchor each cost to a benchmark or organizational policy.
- Lesson 97
Mapping To Forms
- Map internal budget lines to SF-424A and RR Budget categories.
- Apply the federal equipment threshold correctly.
- Compute indirect on the correct base (Modified Total Direct Cost).
- Lesson 98
Budget Revisions
- Identify the rebudgeting actions that require prior written approval under 2 CFR 200.308.
- Scale a scope and budget when the award is less than requested.
- Draft a prior-approval request that pairs a budget table with a narrative justification.
- Lesson 99
AI Spotlight
- Use AI to draft initial budget justification paragraphs from line item data.
- Convert thin justifications into stronger ones using AI as a co-writer.
- Generate the reviewer questions a thin justification would invite and answer them in advance.
Module 10: Narrative Strategy and Reviewer Psychology
- Lesson 100
The Psychology of the Reviewer
- Describe the cognitive state of a typical grant reviewer under time pressure.
- Design a proposal as a two-pass document for skim and deep reading.
- Predict the early decisions a reviewer makes about a proposal in the first ninety seconds.
- Lesson 101
Persuasive Rhetoric
- Apply ethos, pathos, and logos to grant proposal sections.
- Replace passive constructions, hedges, and vague language with active, specific alternatives.
- Identify the line between confident and overclaiming language.
- Lesson 102
"Win Themes"
- Define a win theme and distinguish it from a tagline or value proposition.
- Draft two to four win themes for a real funding opportunity.
- Reinforce themes consistently across abstract, narrative, and evaluation sections.
- Lesson 103
Signposting and Formatting
- Write headings as claims rather than labels.
- Use bold text, bullets, and whitespace deliberately rather than decoratively.
- Re-architect a wall-of-text page so the skim and the deep read tell the same story.
- Lesson 104
Data Visualization
- Choose the right visual form (table, bar chart, timeline, diagram) for a given communication task.
- Write captions that state a claim rather than label a topic.
- Identify visuals that do disproportionate damage when weak or misleading.
- Lesson 105
The Abstract / Executive Summary
- Apply the standard five-part structure (problem, population, intervention, outcomes, capacity) to a 250-word abstract.
- Draft the abstract last, after the rest of the proposal has stabilized.
- Mirror your win themes inside the abstract.
- Lesson 106
Appendices Strategy
- Distinguish appendix material that supports the narrative from material that does not.
- Cross-reference every appendix item from a specific point in the narrative.
- Avoid appendix uses that read as page-limit gaming.
- Lesson 107
The Red Team Review
- Recruit a red team that approximates the real review panel.
- Use the funder's actual scoring rubric to drive red team feedback.
- Time-box the red team read to match the real review.
- Lesson 108
Editing Levels
- Distinguish developmental, line, copy, and proof editing by their guiding question.
- Sequence the four passes in the correct order, with developmental first and proof last.
- Assign different passes to different readers when possible.
- Lesson 109
The "Halo" Effect
- Define the halo effect as a documented cognitive bias in proposal review.
- Engineer the opening page and abstract to anchor reviewers positively.
- Identify first-page failures that do disproportionate damage.
- Lesson 110
AI Spotlight
- Use AI primarily as an editorial assistant, not a drafting tool.
- Run a rhetoric audit on a section using AI to flag passive voice and hedges.
- Simulate a skeptical reviewer using AI to generate the three sharpest panel questions.
Module 11: Federal Grant Specifics
- Lesson 111
The Federal Register & Grants.gov
- Identify the Federal Register and Grants.gov as the authoritative sources for federal opportunities.
- Set up Grants.gov saved searches and agency alerts to monitor live opportunities.
- Read a NOFO for eligibility, deadline, and program priorities in under fifteen minutes.
- Lesson 112
Workspace Mechanics
- Distinguish the AOR, E-Biz POC, and application participant roles in Grants.gov Workspace.
- Stand up a Workspace package, invite collaborators, and lock and unlock forms.
- Run Workspace validation and interpret validation errors before submission.
- Lesson 113
The SF-424 Cover Sheet
- Complete the SF-424 line by line for a federal application.
- Reconcile SF-424 fields against SAM.gov registration data.
- Identify the SF-424 variants (424A, 424B, 424C, 424D) and when each is required.
- Lesson 114
The Assurance and Certifications
- Read the most common federal assurances and certifications and explain each one.
- Identify the legal exposure created by a false certification.
- Distinguish program-specific certifications from the standard SF-424B set.
- Lesson 115
Scoring Rubrics Deconstructed
- Extract the scoring rubric and weights from a federal NOFO.
- Outline a proposal whose structure mirrors the rubric section by section.
- Write topic sentences that name the criterion being addressed.
- Lesson 116
Significance Criteria
- Define Significance as it appears in NIH, NSF, and NEH review.
- Distinguish a significance claim from a background paragraph.
- Write a significance section that passes the so-what test on first reading.
- Lesson 117
Innovative Criteria
- Define Innovation in federal review and distinguish it from novelty for its own sake.
- Write an innovation claim that names current practice and the proposed departure.
- Distinguish technical, conceptual, and applied innovation.
- Lesson 118
Approach Criteria
- Write a methods section that names the design and justifies it against alternatives.
- Build a timeline that respects sequencing and dependencies.
- Anticipate pitfalls with explicit alternative strategies.
- Lesson 119
Agency Culture - NIH Vs. NSF
- Distinguish NIH culture (health, mechanism, clinical translation) from NSF culture (scientific advancement, broader impacts).
- Map proposal language and structure to each agency's review framework.
- Treat NSF Broader Impacts as a scored criterion equal to Intellectual Merit.
- Lesson 120
Agency Culture - NEH & Arts
- Distinguish NEH culture (humanities scholarship, public benefit) from NEA culture (artistic excellence, public engagement).
- Write humanities and arts proposals in their native voice rather than a science voice.
- Treat audience and public engagement as design constraints, not afterthoughts.
- Lesson 121
AI Spotlight
- Build an AI-assisted compliance workflow for federal applications.
- Prompt a model with a NOFO and a draft to produce a structured requirements checklist.
- Identify the failure modes of AI compliance review (hallucinated citations, agency-specific terminology, certifications).
Module 12: Submission, Review, and Resubmission
- Lesson 122
Final Assembly & QA
- Run a comprehensive pre-submission QA pass against a written checklist.
- Catch the most common disqualifiers (pagination, fonts, file names, page limits, missing sections, broken cross-references).
- Assign QA as a named deliverable with an owner and a sign-off.
- Lesson 123
Submission Timing
- Apply the forty-eight-hour rule to any federal or major foundation deadline.
- Back-plan an internal submission timeline from a NOFO deadline.
- Identify the validation, registration, and platform risks that justify the buffer.
- Lesson 124
The Peer Review Process
- Describe the journey of an NIH application from assignment through final scoring.
- Distinguish the roles of the Scientific Review Officer, the program officer, and the panel chair.
- Explain why two or three assigned reviewers carry disproportionate influence over the outcome.
- Lesson 125
Scoring Systems
- Interpret NIH 1-to-9 impact scores and the five core criterion scores.
- Explain how individual scores combine into an overall impact score and a percentile.
- Identify why the Approach criterion disproportionately drives outcomes.
- Lesson 126
The Summary Statement
- Read a summary statement section by section and categorize each critique.
- Distinguish fixable critiques from fatal ones and contradictory comments from consensus.
- Use the resume of discussion to infer the live tensions in the panel.
- Lesson 127
Triage and Streamlining
- Explain what "not discussed" (ND) and "streamlined" actually mean at an NIH study section.
- Read a streamlined summary statement without the resume of discussion.
- Use program officer feedback to fill in gaps that the streamlined critiques leave open.
- Lesson 128
Resubmission Strategy
- Apply a four-factor framework (score, critiques, soundness, currency) to the revise-versus-restart decision.
- Recognize NIH-specific A1 resubmission constraints and timelines.
- Anticipate the political reality of returning to the same study section.
- Lesson 129
Introduction to Resubmission
- Draft a one-page introduction to a resubmission using a four-part structure.
- Demonstrate responsiveness without sounding defensive.
- Disagree diplomatically with a specific reviewer concern when warranted.
- Lesson 130
The Site Visit
- Plan a professional site visit from confirmation email to follow-up note.
- Build an agenda backward from the funder's stated interests.
- Run a pre-visit rehearsal that surfaces inconsistencies before the visitors do.
- Lesson 131
Handling Rejection
- Apply the twenty-four-hour rule before responding to a rejection.
- Run a structured team debrief that produces lessons without descending into blame.
- Recognize the early warning signs of grant-writer burnout.
- Lesson 132
AI Spotlight
- Run an AI red-team pass on a complete proposal draft in under an hour.
- Prompt a model to score against published review criteria with specific quotes from the text.
- Recognize and counter the model's default tendency toward politeness.
Module 13: Post-Award Management
- Lesson 133
The Notice of Award (NoA)
- Identify the standard sections of a federal Notice of Award.
- Distinguish general terms from agency-specific and special terms and conditions.
- Extract reporting deadlines, prior approval triggers, and closeout obligations from an NoA.
- Lesson 134
Grant Setup
- Establish a restricted fund code and chart-of-accounts mapping before first drawdown.
- Assign signing authority, approval thresholds, and compliance task ownership.
- Schedule every reporting deadline and prior approval trigger in a shared calendar.
- Lesson 135
Internal Controls
- Apply the COSO framework to a federal grant environment.
- Design a segregation-of-duties matrix appropriate for organization size.
- Specify compensating controls when full segregation is not feasible.
- Lesson 136
Time and Effort Reporting
- Distinguish budgeted, actual, and certified effort and reconcile the three.
- Implement after-the-fact effort confirmation under 2 CFR 200.430.
- Allocate effort across multiple awards and cost-shared positions.
- Lesson 137
Procurement Standards
- Route any planned purchase to the correct procurement tier under 2 CFR 200.320.
- Apply the micro-purchase ($10K) and simplified acquisition ($250K) thresholds.
- Document a defensible sole-source justification when noncompetitive procurement is necessary.
- Lesson 138
Financial Reporting (FFR)
- Complete each line of the SF-425 Federal Financial Report accurately.
- Reconcile FFR figures to the general ledger, drawdowns, and bank statements.
- Calculate federal share of expenditures, program income, and indirect costs correctly.
- Lesson 139
Performance Reporting (PPR)
- Structure a PPR around your approved logic model and target outcomes.
- Explain variances honestly without triggering unnecessary alarm.
- Reconcile PPR narratives with FFR financial data.
- Lesson 140
Prior Approval Requests
- Identify the prior approval triggers in 2 CFR 200.308 and agency-specific terms.
- Distinguish changes that require prior approval from those that do not.
- Draft a clean written prior approval request to the grants management official.
- Lesson 141
Audit Readiness
- Identify when a Single Audit is required under 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart F.
- Map the compliance requirements auditors test against your operations.
- Maintain a grant binder that consolidates evidence in audit-ready form.
- Lesson 142
Grant Closeout
- Complete a federal closeout within the 120-day window under 2 CFR 200.344.
- Submit final financial, performance, property, and invention reports as required.
- Disposition equipment and handle residual program income properly.
- Lesson 143
AI Spotlight
- Use AI to draft Performance Progress Report narratives from structured inputs.
- Apply red-line review techniques to remove unsupported AI-generated claims.
- Maintain a clean factual chain from source documents to final report text.
Module 14: Advanced Topics and Career Development
- Lesson 144
Career Paths
- Name the five major grant career trajectories and describe what daily work looks like on each.
- Match your strengths and constraints to two or three plausible paths.
- Distinguish in-house roles from independent consulting on autonomy, risk, and income structure.
- Lesson 145
The Freelance Business
- Compare hourly, project-based, and retainer pricing and choose the right structure for a given engagement.
- Set defensible rates based on market, niche, and credentials rather than guesswork.
- Identify the contract clauses that protect a freelance practice from scope creep and nonpayment.
- Lesson 146
Professional Credentials
- Describe what the GPC and CFRE credentials actually require and what they signal.
- Decide whether either credential makes sense for your current career stage.
- Identify the recertification commitment attached to each credential.
- Lesson 147
Continuing Education
- Name the four channels that keep working grant professionals current.
- Build a personal CE plan with a budget line, a calendar slot, and an annual hour target.
- Identify the professional associations most relevant to your career path.
- Lesson 148
Advanced Ethics
- Name the categories of ethical pressure that most often surface in grant practice.
- Cite the GPA Code provisions governing contingent compensation, accurate representation, and conflicts of interest.
- Build a personal pre-commitment that protects you before the moment of pressure arrives.
- Lesson 149
Capital Campaigns
- Distinguish the quiet phase and the public phase of a capital campaign and explain what each requires from a grant writer.
- Describe the mechanics specific to capital work (challenge grants, naming opportunities, multi-year pledges, bridge financing).
- Read a case statement and identify where a foundation grant request fits inside it.
- Lesson 150
Capacity Building Grants
- Explain what capacity building grants fund and how they differ from program grants.
- Identify funder categories that support capacity work.
- Frame a capacity request around a specific organizational diagnostic and a future capability.
- Lesson 151
Corporate Sponsorships
- Distinguish corporate foundation grants, direct corporate gifts, sponsorships, cause-marketing partnerships, and in-kind donations.
- Apply the IRS distinction between qualified sponsorship payments and unrelated business taxable income.
- Route incoming corporate offers to the right internal owner.
- Lesson 152
Trust-Based Philanthropy
- Name the six commonly cited practices of trust-based philanthropy.
- Describe how trust-based practice changes letters of inquiry, reporting, and renewal.
- Identify which of your current funders are moving in this direction.
- Lesson 153
Capstone Synthesis
- Articulate three or four governing principles for your grant practice.
- Name the specific habits that operationalize each principle.
- Identify the part of the field you want to be known for.
- Lesson 154
AI Spotlight
- Identify the tasks AI is already handling well in grant work and the tasks it does poorly.
- Audit your own week into AI-leveraged and human-essential tasks.
- Build a personal disclosure and quality-control policy for AI use.
Module 15: Artificial Intelligence in Grant Strategy
- Lesson 155
The AI Landscape in Grants
- Distinguish generative AI from analytical AI by the task each is built to perform.
- Map common grant tasks to the appropriate AI category before writing a prompt.
- Identify the failure modes that arise when the wrong category is used for a task.
- Lesson 156
Ethics of AI - Bias and Hallucination
- Define algorithmic bias and explain how it appears in grant narratives.
- Define hallucination and recognize its signature patterns in AI output.
- Apply a verification checklist to every statistic, citation, and funder claim.
- Lesson 157
Prompt Engineering - The Persona
- Write a persona line that anchors role, institutional context, and review posture.
- Match persona choice to the specific funder, mechanism, and stage of work.
- Stack personas in sequence to compress a draft-and-review cycle.
- Lesson 158
Prompt Engineering - Context & Constraint
- Build a reusable prompt scaffold with slots for situation, audience, structure, length, and tone.
- Layer constraints without producing contradictory instructions.
- Choose constraints that compress editing time rather than expand it.
- Lesson 159
AI Assisted Prospect Research
- Sequence analytical discovery, primary source collection, and generative synthesis correctly.
- Build a structured funder profile from documents you provided to the model.
- Verify every funder profile against the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search and the funder's website.
- Lesson 160
Accelerating Program Design
- Use AI to surface implementation barriers before they appear in a logic model.
- Generate alternative program models with different cost and risk profiles.
- Map unintended consequences and inequities before they become real harms.
- Lesson 161
Drafting Narratives - Iterative Process
- Run the five-step iterative drafting loop on any narrative section.
- Diagnose which step was skipped when a draft sounds generic or off-strategy.
- Issue refinement instructions that preserve voice while improving structure.
- Lesson 162
AI For Budgeting
- Use AI for multi-year projections, scenario modeling, narrative drafting, and math verification.
- Keep allowability, the indirect cost rate, and the cost share treatment in human hands.
- Write a budget prompt that names the escalator, the fringe rate, and the period of performance.
- Lesson 163
The AI "Red Team"
- Build a three-layer red team protocol: rubric load, persona panel, and synthesis pass.
- Score a proposal against the funder's actual scoring criteria, not generic heuristics.
- Identify the weaknesses that appear across multiple reviewer personas.
- Lesson 164
Data Privacy and Policy
- Identify which data categories cannot enter a consumer-tier AI tool.
- Apply HIPAA, FERPA, and PII handling rules to AI drafting sessions.
- Draft a one-page organizational AI policy covering approved tools and prohibited inputs.
- Lesson 165
Bonus AI Spotlight
- Integrate persona, constraint, iterative drafting, red teaming, and privacy into one workflow.
- Specify the tool layer, the prompt layer, and the process layer for your organization.
- Position your practice for funder disclosure requirements and reviewer detection tooling.
Module 16: Bonus Content
- Lesson 166
Data Privacy and AI
- Identify categories of data (PHI, FERPA-covered records, PII, embargoed research) that must never enter third-party AI tools.
- Read vendor data retention and model-training policies critically.
- De-identify case material before drafting and choose enterprise tooling when sensitive context is truly required.
- Lesson 167
Organizational AI Policy Development
- Draft the core sections of an organizational AI policy (scope, permitted uses, prohibited uses, approval, disclosure, QA, documentation, training).
- Translate vague aspirations into concrete, enforceable rules.
- Align the AI policy with the organization's existing data classification scheme.
- Lesson 168
AI Detection and Authenticity
- Explain how current AI detectors work and why they produce false positives and false negatives.
- Identify prose patterns that increase detection risk (low burstiness, hedged voice, recycled phrasing).
- Use AI for structure and refinement without producing the flat output detectors and reviewers flag.
- Lesson 169
AI For Accessibility
- Use AI to produce plain-language summaries, translations, and accessible document formats.
- Recognize the limits of machine translation and plain-language conversion for culturally specific content.
- Make credible, evidence-backed equity claims in proposals based on actual workflow changes.
- Lesson 170
Funder Policies on AI
- Locate and interpret current funder AI policies, including NIH and NSF guidance.
- Write disclosure language that is honest, specific, and brief.
- Build AI-policy verification into the standard pre-submission checklist.
- Lesson 171
International Funding Overview
- Distinguish bilateral, multilateral, supranational, and private international funding.
- Triage eligibility for international opportunities in under ten minutes.
- Identify when your organization can lead versus when it must partner.
- Lesson 172
European Union Funding
- Describe the three pillars of Horizon Europe and the role of consortia and work packages.
- Build budgets around personnel months and unit costs rather than US line items.
- Apply the open access, data management plan, and ethics requirements that EU funders treat as core.
- Lesson 173
UK and Commonwealth Funding
- Identify the eligibility rules for Wellcome Trust, UKRI, FCDO, and Commonwealth Scholarship programs.
- Translate a US biosketch into a Wellcome-style narrative CV.
- Recognize the role of Full Economic Costing in UK university budgets.
- Lesson 174
United Nations Funding
- Identify the main UN agencies that fund or contract grant-relevant work (UNDP, UNICEF, WHO).
- Navigate framework agreements, expressions of interest, and RFPs as entry points.
- Structure consortia and country-office partnerships that meet UN eligibility expectations.
- Lesson 175
Adapting Skills Globally
- Convert budgets across currencies with documented exchange-rate assumptions.
- Rebuild US logic models against results-based management frameworks.
- Adapt proposal voice for European, multilateral, and UK development audiences.
- Lesson 176
Responsible Ethics (Global)
- Apply major frameworks (Declaration of Helsinki, FAIR/CARE, locally-led principles, equitable partnerships) to proposal design.
- Negotiate authorship, intellectual property, and benefit-sharing at proposal stage rather than after award.
- Adapt consent processes to community context, including community-level consent.
Questions about the course?
Reach out on LinkedIn for curriculum questions, suggestions on where to start based on your background, or to talk grant strategy.