Lesson 82 · The Grant Architect

82. Indirect Costs (F & A) Overview

30 min

By the end you'll be able to

  • Define Facilities and Administrative (F&A) costs and the categories they cover.
  • Explain why federal regulations created indirect cost rates.
  • Distinguish a Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (NICRA) from the de minimis rate.
  • Recognize indirect recovery as partial reimbursement of audited expenses, not profit.

Indirect costs, also called Facilities and Administrative (F&A) costs, are real expenses that benefit multiple projects and cannot be readily assigned to any single one without disproportionate effort. Rent, utilities, depreciation on buildings and general-purpose equipment, the finance team, the human resources team, the executive office, and shared IT infrastructure all fall here. They are not overhead in the dismissive sense. They are the operating substrate that lets the funded project happen at all.

You will see why federal regulations created indirect rates in the first place. Without them, every recipient would have to track utility bills by project, prorate HR effort across awards by minute, and rebuild a cost-allocation spreadsheet every month. Instead, the recipient negotiates a single Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (NICRA) with a cognizant federal agency, or elects the de minimis rate (10 percent of modified total direct costs as of November 2025) if it has never had a NICRA. The agreed rate is then applied to qualifying direct costs across every federal award.

By the end you should understand that indirect cost recovery is not a markup, a profit margin, or a slush fund. It is partial reimbursement of audited expenses the organization has already committed to. Treating it as optional, waiving it without strategic reason, or undercharging it on competitive proposals erodes the financial base that keeps your programs alive.

Common mistakes

These are the traps learners hit most often on this topic. Knowing them in advance is half the fix.

  • Treating indirect recovery as profit.

    Indirect cost recovery reimburses audited operating expenses. Calling it profit invites the funder to negotiate it down and signals that the organization does not understand its own cost structure.

  • Forgetting that not every funder honors federal rates.

    Foundations and some federal programs cap indirect at a lower rate or disallow it entirely. The rate strategy has to match the funder, but the regulatory definition of indirect does not change.

Practice problems

Try each on paper first. Click Show solution only after you've made a real attempt.

  1. Problem 1
    A new executive director says, "We should waive indirect on this proposal to make our budget look smaller and more competitive." Draft a two-sentence reframe.
    Show solution

    Indirect cost recovery is reimbursement of real audited expenses (rent, utilities, finance, HR) that the organization will incur whether or not the grant is awarded, not a markup that inflates the budget. A more durable approach is to budget indirect at the negotiated or de minimis rate and use the narrative to demonstrate the operational infrastructure the recovery actually supports.

Practice quiz

  1. Question 1
    What is the de minimis indirect cost rate as of November 2025 for organizations that have never had a NICRA?
  2. Question 2
    Which of the following is most likely an indirect (F&A) cost?
  3. Reflection 3
    In one or two sentences, explain why waiving indirect recovery on a competitive federal proposal is usually a strategic mistake.

Lesson 82 recap

Indirect (F&A) costs are real shared expenses recovered through a negotiated rate or the 10 percent de minimis. Recovery is reimbursement of audited expenses, not profit.

Coming next: Lesson 83 — Calculating F & A Rates

With the definition in hand, we move to the mechanics: how to calculate F&A correctly using the right rate, the right base, and the right exclusions.

Saved in your browser only — no account, no server.