Lesson 170 · The Grant Architect

170. Funder Policies on AI

30 min

By the end you'll be able to

  • Locate and interpret current funder AI policies, including NIH and NSF guidance.
  • Write disclosure language that is honest, specific, and brief.
  • Build AI-policy verification into the standard pre-submission checklist.
  • Document verification in a way that survives later inquiry or audit.

Funder policies on AI use are evolving faster than almost any other area of grant compliance. NIH has weighed in on AI-generated peer review. NSF has issued guidance for both reviewers and applicants. Some private foundations prohibit AI in proposal drafting outright. Others require disclosure. Many say nothing, which is its own kind of risk. The only safe assumption is that the policy you read last quarter may already be out of date.

In this lesson you will learn how to verify each funder's AI policy before every submission, not just the first one. You will see where policies typically live (program announcements, terms and conditions, FAQ pages, applicant guides), what language to search for, and how to document your verification so a future audit or inquiry has a clear paper trail. You will study the current state of NIH and NSF guidance on AI-generated content and AI-assisted peer review, and the disclosure norms emerging at major foundations. You will also learn to write disclosure language that is honest, specific, and brief, because vague disclosures (we used AI tools in our process) are nearly as risky as no disclosure at all.

By the end you should treat AI policy verification as a standard checklist item alongside formatting, page limits, and budget caps. The cost of the habit is small. The cost of skipping it can be a disqualified proposal.

Common mistakes

These are the traps learners hit most often on this topic. Knowing them in advance is half the fix.

  • Verifying once at the start of the cycle.

    Policies change between announcements. Verify on the specific call you are submitting to, not on last year's version.

  • Disclosing in the cover letter only when the application form asks elsewhere.

    Place disclosures where the funder specifies. A correctly worded disclosure in the wrong location can still trigger a compliance flag.

Practice problems

Try each on paper first. Click Show solution only after you've made a real attempt.

  1. Problem 1
    Write a two-sentence AI disclosure for an NIH proposal where you used a model to outline the Specific Aims, draft a first pass of the budget justification, and check grammar on the Approach section.
    Show solution

    We used a large language model to draft an initial outline of the Specific Aims and a first-pass budget justification, both of which were rewritten and verified by the principal investigator and the grants office before submission. We also used the same tool for grammar and clarity checks on the Approach section, with no content changes made by the model.

Practice quiz

  1. Question 1
    Which statement best describes the current state of funder policies on AI?
  2. Question 2
    Why is "we used AI tools in our process" considered a weak disclosure?

Lesson 170 recap

Funder AI policies vary and change. Verification before every submission, honest specific disclosure, and a documented paper trail are the standard.

Coming next: Lesson 171 — International Funding Overview

Next, we step outside the US and map the international funding landscape that completes a Grant Architect's range.

Saved in your browser only — no account, no server.