95. Program Income
By the end you'll be able to
- Define program income under 2 CFR 200.307.
- Distinguish the additive, deductive, and matching methods of treatment.
- Set up tracking so program income is captured against the project.
- Anticipate which project designs are likely to generate program income.
Program income is money your project generates during the period of performance: registration fees, ticket sales, publication royalties, fees for services, and proceeds from selling equipment purchased with grant funds. In this lesson you learn why program income is restricted, why most recipients mishandle it, and why mishandling it can require returning funds to the federal awarding agency long after the project closes.
You will distinguish the three methods of treating program income under 2 CFR 200.307. The additive method (the default for most federal awards) lets you add program income to the federal share and use it to expand the scope of work. The deductive method requires you to subtract program income from the federal share, effectively reducing the award. The matching method lets you apply program income against a cost-sharing requirement. Each method has to be authorized in the award terms, tracked separately in your accounting system, and reported on the SF-425 financial report. You also have to keep generating the underlying activity to keep claiming the income.
By the end you should be able to spot a project likely to generate program income during proposal development, propose the right treatment method for the funder, and set up the bookkeeping so revenue is captured against the project rather than absorbed into general operating funds where it cannot be reconciled later.
Common mistakes
These are the traps learners hit most often on this topic. Knowing them in advance is half the fix.
Treating registration fees as unrestricted earned revenue.
If the activity that generated the income was supported by the grant, the income is program income. Sweeping it into the general fund is the most common mishandling.
Skipping the treatment method conversation with the program officer.
The additive method is default for most awards but not all. Confirming the method in writing before income starts flowing prevents reclassification fights later.
Practice problems
Try each on paper first. Click Show solution only after you've made a real attempt.
- Problem 1A federally funded workforce training program will charge participants a $50 registration fee. Describe how to treat the program income across the four required steps.
Show solution
Treatment: confirm with the program officer that the additive method applies, then use the registration fees to expand scope (extra cohort, materials, or evaluation). Accounting: create a project-specific revenue code linked to the grant restricted fund, separate from unrestricted earned revenue. Reporting: report program income earned and expended on SF-425 each cycle. Post-period: program income generated after the period of performance generally is no longer restricted under 2 CFR 200.307, but confirm with the award terms because some agencies extend the restriction.
Practice quiz
- Question 1Which is the default treatment of program income for most federal awards absent other instructions?
- Question 2Which of these revenue streams is most clearly program income?
- Reflection 3Why does the lesson warn that mishandling program income can require returning funds long after the project closes?
Lesson 95 recap
Program income is grant-generated revenue under 2 CFR 200.307. It is treated using the additive, deductive, or matching method, must be tracked separately, and is reported on the SF-425.
Coming next: Lesson 96 — Writing The Budget Justification
Next, we turn from numbers to narrative as we learn to write budget justifications that preempt reviewer questions rather than invite them.
Saved in your browser only — no account, no server.